tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5040905401106383376.post3011467655647034580..comments2023-10-26T13:07:16.616+02:00Comments on Leadership by virtue: Leadership and “happy” organizationJaro Bercehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10171943636330818906noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5040905401106383376.post-90399759667340682752013-04-25T20:30:31.160+02:002013-04-25T20:30:31.160+02:00Imagine if most of 70% of employees, that are now ...Imagine if most of 70% of employees, that are now under-performing, would start to work better? Would numbers still matter or would be higher? I turn your million question into: who would not aim for win-win situation as opposed to current win-lose to gain more?Jaro Bercehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10171943636330818906noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5040905401106383376.post-46620699854946330682013-04-25T09:40:10.037+02:002013-04-25T09:40:10.037+02:00While the views are somewhat ideal, and hence diff...While the views are somewhat ideal, and hence difficult to find takers. Most of the CEOs got the position because of the numbers they could show/produce to Board and not because of leadership they gave to organisations or people. Therefore, while leadership by virtue is desirable there is an inherent contradiction in the theory. It requires the leaders to change once they reach a level which is very difficult- they have to unlearn ( what got them there ) and learn a fresh. The million dollar question is who has the time and need for the same ?Yogesh Yogihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01629308532946757302noreply@blogger.com