In last two posts I have written about the difference between two, many times interchanged, organizational functions that are necessary to any organization: management (To manage people) and leadership (To lead people). As there is more to both of them, here I’d like to share with you some more of my views on leadership attitudes, the ones that I consider important.
Many of you will agree that leadership is more about who the leader is than what he/she is actually doing. Therefore, we may assume that the attitude is important when influencing, impacting and leading people.
To lead people
Have you heard of many great managers of
the past? Probably much less than about great leaders. That is why “to manage”
and “to lead” are two distinguishing roles. They are both needed in society and
organizations.
The verb “to lead” has a great history down
to the philosophical writings from Plato's Republic to Plutarch's Lives in
which he explored the question “What qualities distinguish an individual as a
leader?” In one of my previous posts “China’s history and culture impacting
Leadership – 1”
(and following )
I've written about the Far East’ perception on leadership. And what internet
has to say about the verb “to lead”?
- To show the way to by going in advance
- To go first as a guide.
- To direct on a course or in a direction
- To guide someone or something along a way.
- To go before or with to show the way; conduct or escort: to lead a group on a cross-country hike
- To take the initiative; begin.
To manage people
I've learned that the verb “to manage” comes from the Italian maneggiare (to handle, especially tools), which derives from the Latin word manus (hand). So I've searched dictionaries and Internet and come with broader definitions of the meaning of the word:
The Free dictionary:
The Merriam Webster:
The Dictionary.com :
The Free dictionary:
- To direct or control the use of; handle: manage a complex machine tool
- To direct the affairs or interests of: manage a company; an agency that manages performers
The Merriam Webster:
- To have control of (something, such as a business, department, sports team, etc.)
The Dictionary.com :
- To dominate or influence (a person) by tact, flattery, or artifice: He manages the child with exemplary skill.
- To handle, direct, govern, or control in action or use: She managed the boat efficiently.
Martial arts solution to conflict
In previous post Leadership and conflict I've explained what conflict is, the types of conflict and how to resolve them as a leader. In this post I would add my additional thoughts on the subject from a different angle of view.
Martial arts are mostly thought of as being violent. At the beginning of each enrolment year there come those that want to fight. They see martial arts as a solution to their way of solving conflicts on streets, in bars or other locations. They feel that they will be “equipped” with better tooling and can turn the outcome of the conflict in their favor.
The main question is: “Is that so?”
There are two ways to answer this question that may mislead the answer to just one direction: the direction in which one is able only to fight back.
Martial arts are mostly thought of as being violent. At the beginning of each enrolment year there come those that want to fight. They see martial arts as a solution to their way of solving conflicts on streets, in bars or other locations. They feel that they will be “equipped” with better tooling and can turn the outcome of the conflict in their favor.
The main question is: “Is that so?”
There are two ways to answer this question that may mislead the answer to just one direction: the direction in which one is able only to fight back.
Leadership and conflict
Searching for a good definition of a conflict I found on Internet:
- a conflict is a serious disagreement or argument, typically a protracted one,
- a state of mind in which a person experiences a clash of opposing feelings or needs,
- a fight, battle or war, or struggle, especially a prolonged struggle; strife
- a psychic struggle, often unconscious, resulting from the opposition or simultaneous functioning of mutually exclusive impulses, desires, or tendencies,
- a state of opposition between ideas, interests, etc; disagreement or controversy.
- Intrapersonal conflict occurs within an individual,
- Interpersonal conflict refers to a conflict between two individuals,
- Intragroup conflict is a type of conflict that happens among individuals within a team and
- Intergroup conflict takes place when a misunderstanding arises among different teams within an organization.
- Grouping them, literature suggests that at workplace there are (only) two types of conflict: healthy and un-constructive. So, it is said that a healthy conflict can benefit a business and leads to a more innovative, inclusive and learning mind-set around disputes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)